rkhunter wrote:why? i thought everybody has same hashes and samples from maher/crysys no?EP_X0FF wrote:Hehe dr.web fails again.I'm not surprised, think you too.
A forum for reverse engineering, OS internals and malware analysis
rkhunter wrote:why? i thought everybody has same hashes and samples from maher/crysys no?EP_X0FF wrote:Hehe dr.web fails again.I'm not surprised, think you too.
kmd wrote:I think they got initial pack (maybe incomplete, based on crysys hashes) - created detection, and then did not even bothered to do any kind of dynamic analysis ("it is not interested" - lolwut, AV company not interested in malware, facepalm) and successfully forgot about the rest.rkhunter wrote:why? i thought everybody has same hashes and samples from maher/crysys no?EP_X0FF wrote:Hehe dr.web fails again.I'm not surprised, think you too.
EP_X0FF wrote:In attach both dat files decryptedIn attach cutted pe.
rkhunter wrote:Just for fun - another apocalypse from Hypponen http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/0 ... rity-fail/I seems to be missed something in time perspective. When did this guy turned into full of hysterics little girl? Is it global trend out there?
We really should have been able to do better. But we didn’t.So I have advice for author - how about start doing better right now by stopping publishing such idiotic summaries? :)