hx1997 wrote:Wow, I feel like an idiot. My explorer window wasn't wide enough so I thought they were just MD5 hashes and not SHA256. Embarrassing.Patrick wrote:Thanks for the quick reply.db405ad775ac887a337b02ea8b07fddc and 01c2f321b6bfdb9473c079b0797567ba are MD5 hashes. 225e9596de85ca7b1025d6e444f6a01aa6507feef213f4d2e20da9e7d5d8e430 and 392f32241cd3448c7a435935f2ff0d2cdc609dda81dd4946b1c977d25134e96e are their equivalent SHA256 hashes respectively, which are both included in that sample. Thought you'd know that, they're the same files with hashes of different algorithms.
Unless I am blind though, or unless one (or many) of those hashes are the same, just differently packaged, etc, neither db405ad775ac887a337b02ea8b07fddc or 01c2f321b6bfdb9473c079b0797567ba are included in that sample.
https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA14-329A
Unusual stage 1 files apparently compiled from various public source codes merged with malicious code:
01c2f321b6bfdb9473c079b0797567ba
47d0e8f9d7a6429920329207a32ecc2e
744c07e886497f7b68f6f7fe57b7ab54
db405ad775ac887a337b02ea8b07fddc
Thanks a lot for clearing that up.
"This Regin driver recurrently checks that the current IRQL is set to PASSIVE_LEVEL using the KeGetCurrentIrql() function in many parts of the code, probably in order to operate as silently as possible"